Why Server-to-Server App Conversion Tracking is More Effective than SDK: A Comprehensive Analysis of Benefits
Using server-to-server app conversion tracking gives more accurate data & reduces SDK size, leading to better app performance & user experience.
Mobile advertising has become a crucial aspect of digital marketing. With ad spend on mobile advertising projected to surpass $240 billion globally by 2022, it's no wonder that marketers are looking for ways to optimize their campaigns. One of the most important aspects of mobile advertising is app conversion tracking, which allows marketers to measure the success of their campaigns. There are two main methods of app conversion tracking: server-to-server and SDK. While both methods have their advantages, server-to-server tracking offers several key benefits that make it the preferred choice for many marketers.
Firstly, server-to-server tracking offers greater accuracy than SDK tracking. SDK tracking relies on the user's device to provide data on app installs and events. However, this can be unreliable, as users may disable tracking on their devices or use outdated operating systems. Server-to-server tracking, on the other hand, uses data directly from the app store and the advertiser's server, ensuring that the data is accurate and up-to-date. This accuracy is essential for measuring the success of campaigns and optimizing future efforts.
In addition to greater accuracy, server-to-server tracking also offers greater security. SDK tracking requires advertisers to integrate a third-party software development kit into their app, which can pose security risks. Hackers can potentially exploit vulnerabilities in the SDK to gain access to sensitive information. Server-to-server tracking, however, does not require any integration with third-party software, making it more secure and less vulnerable to attacks.
Another advantage of server-to-server tracking is that it is more flexible than SDK tracking. With SDK tracking, advertisers must integrate the SDK into their app before they can track conversions. This can be time-consuming and may require assistance from developers. Server-to-server tracking, on the other hand, can be set up quickly and easily, without the need for any app integration. This flexibility allows advertisers to start tracking conversions immediately, without any delays.
Server-to-server tracking also offers greater scalability than SDK tracking. With SDK tracking, advertisers must integrate the SDK into every app they wish to track. This can be a daunting task for companies with multiple apps or for advertisers who work with a large number of publishers. Server-to-server tracking, however, can be implemented across all apps and publishers with ease. This scalability makes it an ideal choice for companies with multiple apps or for advertisers who work with many publishers.
In addition to these benefits, server-to-server tracking also offers greater transparency than SDK tracking. With SDK tracking, advertisers may not have access to all the data they need to make informed decisions about their campaigns. Server-to-server tracking, on the other hand, provides advertisers with access to all the data they need to optimize their campaigns. This transparency allows advertisers to make data-driven decisions that lead to better results.
Furthermore, server-to-server tracking can provide a more seamless user experience than SDK tracking. With SDK tracking, users may be prompted to download additional software or to enable tracking on their devices. This can be off-putting for some users and may result in fewer conversions. Server-to-server tracking, however, does not require any additional downloads or settings changes, making it a more seamless experience for users.
Overall, server-to-server tracking offers several key benefits over SDK tracking. It provides greater accuracy, security, flexibility, scalability, transparency, and user experience. These benefits make it the preferred choice for many marketers who want to optimize their mobile advertising campaigns and achieve better results. As the importance of mobile advertising continues to grow, it's clear that server-to-server tracking will play an increasingly important role in helping advertisers measure the success of their campaigns.
Introduction
When it comes to mobile app marketing, measuring the success of your campaigns is crucial. One of the ways to track the performance of your ads is through conversion tracking. There are two methods of doing this- server-to-server and SDK-based conversion tracking. In this article, we will be discussing the benefits of using server-to-server app conversion tracking over an SDK.What is Server-to-Server App Conversion Tracking?
Server-to-server app conversion tracking is a type of conversion tracking that involves the exchange of information between the advertiser's server and the publisher's server. This method of tracking does not require an SDK integration and operates by using postback URLs.How does it work?
When a user clicks on an ad, they are redirected to the advertiser's landing page. If the user installs the app, the information about the installation is sent to the advertiser's server through a postback URL. This information is then matched with the data collected by the publisher's server to determine the source of the download.Benefits of Server-to-Server App Conversion Tracking
Accurate Attribution
One of the significant benefits of using server-to-server app conversion tracking is the accuracy of attribution. This method of tracking ensures that the conversion data is accurate because it is based on post-install events rather than clicks. This means that advertisers can determine which ads are driving conversions and optimize their campaigns accordingly.No Need for SDK Integration
Another benefit of server-to-server app conversion tracking is that it does not require SDK integration. This means that advertisers do not have to worry about updating the SDK every time there is a new version of the app. It also means that advertisers can track conversions across multiple devices without any additional effort.Lower Latency
Server-to-server app conversion tracking has a lower latency than SDK-based tracking. This means that the data is processed faster, and advertisers can make decisions based on real-time information.More Secure
Server-to-server app conversion tracking is more secure than SDK-based tracking. This is because postback URLs are encrypted, making it difficult for hackers to intercept the data.More Flexibility
Server-to-server app conversion tracking is more flexible than SDK-based tracking. Advertisers can track conversions across multiple platforms, including iOS and Android, without any additional effort. This means that advertisers can reach a broader audience and optimize their campaigns for better results.Cost-Effective
Server-to-server app conversion tracking is cost-effective compared to SDK-based tracking. This is because it does not require an SDK integration, which can be expensive and time-consuming.Conclusion
In conclusion, server-to-server app conversion tracking is an effective way to track the performance of your mobile app marketing campaigns. It provides accurate attribution, does not require SDK integration, has a lower latency, is more secure, offers more flexibility, and is cost-effective. Therefore, if you are looking to optimize your mobile app marketing campaigns, it's worth considering using server-to-server app conversion tracking.Server-to-Server App Conversion Tracking vs SDK: Which One is Better?
Mobile app developers and marketers constantly look for ways to optimize their campaigns and measure their success. One crucial aspect of this process is conversion tracking, which enables them to track user actions within their app and attribute those actions to specific marketing channels. However, there are two main methods of implementing conversion tracking: using an SDK (Software Development Kit) or a server-to-server integration. In this article, we will explore the benefits of using server-to-server app conversion tracking over an SDK, and how it can help improve your app's performance and user experience.Reduced App Size
One of the main advantages of server-to-server app conversion tracking is that it does not require an SDK to be integrated into the app itself. This means that the app's size and complexity are not affected by the tracking implementation, which can be particularly beneficial for smaller apps or those with limited storage capacity.With an SDK-based approach, the tracking code needs to be included in the app's codebase, which can increase its size and potentially affect its performance. Moreover, if the app needs to be updated, the SDK also needs to be updated, which can be time-consuming and may require additional testing to ensure compatibility with the new version of the app.Increased Accuracy
Another benefit of server-to-server app conversion tracking is its increased accuracy compared to SDK-based tracking. With server-to-server tracking, the conversion data is sent directly from the app's server to the advertiser's server, without any intermediary steps. This means that there is less chance of data loss or discrepancies due to network delays or connectivity issues.In contrast, with an SDK-based approach, the tracking data needs to be transmitted from the app to the SDK, and then from the SDK to the advertiser's server. This multi-step process can introduce errors or delays, especially if the user's device is experiencing network connectivity issues or has limited processing power.Enhanced Security
Server-to-server app conversion tracking also offers enhanced security compared to SDK-based tracking. Since the tracking data is transmitted directly between servers, there is no need for any sensitive user data to be stored on the user's device or transmitted through third-party networks. This can help reduce the risk of data breaches or other security vulnerabilities.Moreover, server-to-server tracking typically uses secure protocols such as HTTPS or SSL to encrypt the data during transmission, further enhancing its security. In contrast, SDK-based tracking may use less secure methods such as HTTP or custom protocols, which can make the data more vulnerable to interception or tampering.Limited Dependencies
Another advantage of server-to-server app conversion tracking is its limited dependencies on external libraries or frameworks. Since the tracking code is executed on the app's server rather than the user's device, there is no need for the app to rely on any specific SDK or platform-specific features. This can help ensure better compatibility with different types of devices and operating systems, as well as reduce the risk of conflicts or compatibility issues.In contrast, SDK-based tracking often requires the app to use specific SDKs or APIs, which can increase its dependencies on external libraries or frameworks. This can make the app more complex and potentially introduce compatibility or performance issues.Improved Data Privacy
Server-to-server app conversion tracking also offers improved data privacy compared to SDK-based tracking. Since the tracking data is transmitted directly between servers and does not require any sensitive user data to be stored on the user's device, there is less risk of data exposure or unauthorized access.Moreover, server-to-server tracking typically uses anonymized or pseudonymized data to protect user privacy, further enhancing its data protection measures. In contrast, SDK-based tracking may require the app to collect and transmit more detailed user data, which can raise privacy concerns or legal compliance issues.Faster Implementation
Another benefit of server-to-server app conversion tracking is its faster implementation compared to SDK-based tracking. Since the tracking code is executed on the app's server, there is no need for the developer to integrate an SDK into the app's codebase or test it extensively for compatibility. This can help reduce the time and effort required to implement the tracking solution, as well as enable faster iteration and optimization.In contrast, SDK-based tracking may require more extensive integration and testing, particularly if the app is complex or has specific requirements. This can make the implementation process slower and potentially introduce delays or errors.Reduced Maintenance
Server-to-server app conversion tracking also offers reduced maintenance compared to SDK-based tracking. Since the tracking code is executed on the app's server, there is no need to update or maintain an SDK within the app's codebase. This can help reduce the ongoing maintenance and support costs associated with the tracking solution, as well as simplify the overall development process.Moreover, server-to-server tracking typically requires less ongoing maintenance than SDK-based tracking, since it is less prone to compatibility or performance issues. This can help free up developer resources and enable them to focus on other areas of the app's development or optimization.Cost-Effective Solution
Another advantage of server-to-server app conversion tracking is its cost-effectiveness compared to SDK-based tracking. Since the tracking code is executed on the app's server, there is no need to pay for any additional SDK licensing or usage fees. This can help reduce the overall cost of implementing and maintaining the tracking solution, as well as enable more efficient budget allocation for other marketing or development activities.Moreover, server-to-server tracking typically requires less ongoing maintenance and support than SDK-based tracking, further reducing its long-term cost. This can help improve the app's profitability and ROI, as well as enable more effective resource allocation.Customizable Configuration
Server-to-server app conversion tracking also offers customizable configuration options compared to SDK-based tracking. Since the tracking code is executed on the app's server, developers have more flexibility in configuring the tracking parameters and data collection methods. This can enable them to tailor the tracking solution to their specific needs and goals, as well as optimize its performance and accuracy.Moreover, server-to-server tracking typically supports more advanced tracking features such as cross-device tracking or multi-channel attribution, which can provide deeper insights into user behavior and engagement. In contrast, SDK-based tracking may be more limited in its configuration options and tracking capabilities, which can restrict the app's ability to measure its success or optimize its campaigns.Better User Experience
Finally, server-to-server app conversion tracking can help improve the overall user experience compared to SDK-based tracking. Since the tracking code is executed on the app's server and does not require any additional libraries or frameworks, it can help reduce the app's load time and improve its performance. This can lead to a better user experience and higher engagement rates, as well as reduce the risk of user churn or negative reviews.Moreover, server-to-server tracking typically uses anonymized or pseudonymized data to protect user privacy, which can help build trust and loyalty among users. This can lead to higher retention rates and increased lifetime value, as well as enable more effective user acquisition and retention strategies.Conclusion
In conclusion, server-to-server app conversion tracking offers numerous benefits over SDK-based tracking, including reduced app size, increased accuracy, enhanced security, limited dependencies, improved data privacy, faster implementation, reduced maintenance, cost-effectiveness, customizable configuration, and better user experience. By leveraging server-to-server tracking, mobile app developers and marketers can optimize their campaigns, measure their success, and improve their app's performance and user engagement.Benefits of using Server-to-Server App Conversion Tracking over an SDK
Point of View
As a marketer and advertiser, choosing the right app conversion tracking method is crucial in measuring the effectiveness of campaigns. Among the available options, server-to-server app conversion tracking offers several advantages over the SDK approach.Pros
1. Improved Accuracy: Server-to-server app conversion tracking eliminates the need for relying on device identifiers, which are prone to inaccuracies due to changes in settings or device upgrades. This method uses a unique identifier that links the user to the action taken, providing more accurate data.2. Faster Implementation: With server-to-server app conversion tracking, advertisers can avoid the lengthy and complex process of integrating SDKs into their apps. Instead, they can set up the tracking by simply sending HTTP requests to the server, resulting in faster implementation.3. Better Privacy: Server-to-server app conversion tracking ensures better privacy protection for users, since no personal information is collected or stored on the device. Additionally, the server-side approach is less vulnerable to fraud or other malicious activities.Cons
1. Limited Data: Unlike the SDK approach, server-to-server app conversion tracking may not provide detailed insights into user behavior or engagement within the app. This method is primarily focused on measuring specific actions, such as installs or purchases.2. Technical Expertise: Implementing server-to-server app conversion tracking requires technical expertise, which may be a challenge for small businesses or non-technical marketers. It may require working with developers or hiring external experts, resulting in additional costs.Table Comparison
| Factors | Server-to-Server App Conversion Tracking | SDK App Conversion Tracking |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy | High | Medium |
| Implementation | Quick and Easy | Complex and Time-Consuming |
| Privacy | High | Medium |
| Data Insights | Basic | Detailed |
| Technical Expertise | Required | Optional |
The Benefits of Using Server-to-Server App Conversion Tracking Over an SDK
Welcome to our blog! If you're reading this, then you're probably interested in mobile app tracking and how it can benefit your business. In today's article, we'll be discussing the benefits of using server-to-server app conversion tracking over an SDK.
First, let's define what server-to-server app conversion tracking and SDK are. The SDK (Software Development Kit) is a set of tools provided by mobile app tracking platforms that developers integrate into their apps to track user behavior and app installs. On the other hand, server-to-server app conversion tracking allows tracking without the need for an SDK. Instead, advertisers send data directly to the tracking platform's server through their own server.
So, why would you choose server-to-server app conversion tracking over an SDK? Here are some of the benefits:
1. No Need for App Updates
One of the most significant benefits of using server-to-server app conversion tracking is that there is no need for app updates. When using an SDK, every change made to the tracking process requires an app update. This can be time-consuming and costly, especially if you have multiple apps. With server-to-server app conversion tracking, changes can be made on the server-side, allowing for faster implementation and fewer app updates.
2. Fraud Prevention
Another benefit of using server-to-server app conversion tracking is that it helps prevent fraud. Fraudsters can easily manipulate SDKs to fake installs or actions, leading to inaccurate data. With server-to-server app conversion tracking, advertisers can validate data and ensure that only legitimate conversions are counted. This reduces the risk of ad fraud and provides more accurate reporting.
3. Improved Privacy
With the increasing concern over data privacy, server-to-server app conversion tracking provides enhanced privacy. SDKs collect data from users' devices, which can lead to privacy concerns. On the other hand, server-to-server app conversion tracking collects data only from advertisers' servers, reducing the amount of data collected from users' devices.
4. Better User Experience
Using an SDK can impact the user experience of your app. SDKs can affect app performance, increase app size, and drain battery life. With server-to-server app conversion tracking, there is no need to integrate an SDK, leading to a better user experience.
5. Cost-Effective
Finally, server-to-server app conversion tracking can be cost-effective. An SDK requires development time and resources to integrate, test, and update. Server-to-server app conversion tracking eliminates these costs, allowing for more efficient use of resources and a lower total cost of ownership.
In conclusion, server-to-server app conversion tracking offers many benefits over an SDK. It eliminates the need for app updates, helps prevent fraud, improves privacy, provides a better user experience, and is cost-effective. If you're looking for a more efficient and accurate way to track your mobile app conversions, consider using server-to-server app conversion tracking.
Thank you for reading our blog! We hope you found this article helpful. If you have any questions or comments, please feel free to contact us.
People Also Ask About Which Is a Benefit of Using Server-to-Server App Conversion Tracking over an SDK?
What is Server-to-Server App Conversion Tracking?
Server-to-server app conversion tracking is a method of tracking app installs and in-app events by sending data directly from the ad network's servers to the advertiser's server. This eliminates the need for an SDK (software development kit) in the advertiser's app.
What is an SDK?
An SDK (software development kit) is a set of tools, libraries, and documentation that developers use to build apps for a specific platform or operating system. In the context of mobile advertising, an SDK is used to track app installs and in-app events by integrating code into the advertiser's app.
What are the Benefits of Using Server-to-Server App Conversion Tracking?
There are several benefits of using server-to-server app conversion tracking over an SDK:
Accuracy: Server-to-server tracking is generally more accurate than SDK tracking because it relies on server-side data rather than device-side data. This means that it can capture installs and events that may be missed by an SDK, such as when a user installs an app but doesn't open it immediately.
Flexibility: Server-to-server tracking doesn't require an SDK to be integrated into the advertiser's app, which can be useful for advertisers who don't have access to the app's source code or who want to avoid the potential performance impact of an SDK.
Privacy: Server-to-server tracking can be more privacy-friendly than SDK tracking because it doesn't rely on device identifiers or other personal data that could be used to identify individual users.
How Does Server-to-Server App Conversion Tracking Work?
Server-to-server app conversion tracking works by sending data from the ad network's servers to the advertiser's server using an API (application programming interface). The API allows the two servers to communicate with each other and exchange data in real-time. The data that is exchanged typically includes information about the ad impression, such as the ad ID, the user's device type and operating system, and the timestamp of the impression. When an install or in-app event occurs, the ad network's server sends a postback to the advertiser's server with information about the event, such as the device ID, the event type, and the timestamp.